What to Do Next
The problem of turbidity won't "settle" down anytime soon, and in the near
future it may get even worse, as nutrient inputs and erosion from agriculture
increase from Third World countries. In addition, global warming could even
exacerbate the problem with increased rainfall, causing more floods, and sea
level rise, causing increased coastal erosion.
One way to address the problem is with better sensors. SeaWiFS was
primarily designed to accomplish the goal of observing the entire global ocean
and determining the chlorophyll concentration everywhere to an accuracy of
35%. The SeaWiFS Project currently uses a global algorithm (the OC4
algorithm, described in More than Meets the Eye) that
switches the bands used to calculate chlorophyll concentration as radiance
changes, which adapts the algorithm to a range of conditions.
But this algorithm only goes so far. Optical oceanographers know that
knowledge of regional water characteristics can be used to tune analytical
algorithms to produce better results than a single algorithm used to analyse
the entire world. So one way to address the problem of turbidity and Case 2
waters is to create a set of regional algorithms that overlapto cover
problematic areas.
The next way to improve the analyses is to add more bands to the
instrument. The optical properties of the various materials and conditions
that create Case 2 water conditions interact to produce what the sensors
observe. By adding more bands, algorithms employing these bands can "unravel"
the tangled knot of optical characteristics and isolate the contribution of
each. An example of how this might be done is the use of the 412 nm band
found on SeaWiFS and MODIS. Gelbstoffe absorbs light strongly at this
wavelength, much more than chlorophyll, so light absorption in this band can be
used to calculate the concentration of Gelbstoffe.
Beyond the addition of bands, improving the optical capabilities of the
instrument also aids the discrimination of optical properties in Case 2
waters. In overly simple terms, the "signal"due to chlorophyll in Case 2
waters is obscured by the optical "noise"of the other factors that have been
described. By improving the optical performance of the instrument, the
instrument will be more sensitive to the signal compared to the noise. The
signal-to-noise ratio of the optical bands in SeaWiFS was more than 10 times
better than its predecessor, the Coastal Zone Color Scanner, and MODIS is
significantly improved over SeaWiFS. Furthermore, the width of the bands in
MODIS is smaller than for SeaWiFS, which also helps to isolate the signal that
is being measured.
The final factor that can be added is increased creativity by scientists
studying the complex optical mixture found in Case 2 waters. Some
researchers have employed iterative algorithms that test a variety of possible
conditions until they converge on a single, hopefully accurate, answer. These
algorithms take much more computational effort than the band ratio algorithms
employed by the SeaWiFS Project, but they offer one of the only current ways to
separate the contributions of various factors. Other groups have
successfully improved atmospheric correction over turbid coastal waters by
changing the assumptions that go into the global analytical algorithms. (See
"Atmospheric Correction of SeaWiFS data for turbid waters" below.)
Looking to the future, the next major advance in Case 2 water analysis may
be a hyperspectral ocean color sensor. A hyperspectral sensor, such as the Hyperion
instrument on the Earth Observer-1
(EO-1) mission, collects data in many more bands than SeaWiFS or MODIS.
Hyperion has 220 bands in the 0.4 to 2.5 µm wavelength range. To be
effective, a hyperspectral ocean sensor would have to possess the same optical
capabilities of SeaWiFS or MODIS -- and such an instrument has not been built
yet.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Dr. Kevin Ruddick of the Ocean Colour Research Unit of the
Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models (MUMM) provided a review
of this Science Focus! article.
Links
<< Back
Return to Index
|